<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sarah Silverman on The State of Marriage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.johnlacey.net/sarah-silverman-on-the-state-of-marriage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.johnlacey.net/sarah-silverman-on-the-state-of-marriage/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 19:15:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Taylor Siluwé</title>
		<link>http://blog.johnlacey.net/sarah-silverman-on-the-state-of-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-11267</link>
		<dc:creator>Taylor Siluwé</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 17:24:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.johnlacey.net/?p=1580#comment-11267</guid>
		<description>Wow, Gareth, I&#039;m not quite sure if your comment made my Valentine&#039;s Day or depressed the hell out of me.  Maybe a little of both.  Awesome perspective though.

Anyway, I say go Sarah.  Loved her before and this attitude is no surprise to me; however, the creeping, tentative applause to her comments was a little eye-opening.  Maybe too many audience members just came to see Hasselbeck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, Gareth, I&#8217;m not quite sure if your comment made my Valentine&#8217;s Day or depressed the hell out of me.  Maybe a little of both.  Awesome perspective though.</p>
<p>Anyway, I say go Sarah.  Loved her before and this attitude is no surprise to me; however, the creeping, tentative applause to her comments was a little eye-opening.  Maybe too many audience members just came to see Hasselbeck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carrie-lee</title>
		<link>http://blog.johnlacey.net/sarah-silverman-on-the-state-of-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-11202</link>
		<dc:creator>carrie-lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 03:37:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.johnlacey.net/?p=1580#comment-11202</guid>
		<description>I agree with her to a point. I find it gross as well. Inequality that is being condoned and written into law just baffles me. To tell others that marriage should be boycotted, meh, not sure that works for me. But props to those willing to go to those lengths. 

And comment above me: really dude?

CL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with her to a point. I find it gross as well. Inequality that is being condoned and written into law just baffles me. To tell others that marriage should be boycotted, meh, not sure that works for me. But props to those willing to go to those lengths. </p>
<p>And comment above me: really dude?</p>
<p>CL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gareth Liew</title>
		<link>http://blog.johnlacey.net/sarah-silverman-on-the-state-of-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-11194</link>
		<dc:creator>Gareth Liew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 13:46:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.johnlacey.net/?p=1580#comment-11194</guid>
		<description>Yeah tell me about it. It seems to be a growing trend. People want to enjoy a relationship without the commitment. Just make use of one another to create the illusion of fulfilling that gaping emptiness within each and every human being until there is no longer any use for the other party. Then both parties break apart, not knowing that they had damaged one another unknowingly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah tell me about it. It seems to be a growing trend. People want to enjoy a relationship without the commitment. Just make use of one another to create the illusion of fulfilling that gaping emptiness within each and every human being until there is no longer any use for the other party. Then both parties break apart, not knowing that they had damaged one another unknowingly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
